Se Habla Espaรฑol
Lines are Available 24/7
Se Habla Espaรฑol
My office litigates trust disputes throughout the state of Florida. One major recurring topic is the removal of Trustees. We will explore some of the reasons why a Trustee can be removed.
Here are the more common reasons:
Other Good Cause.
A good place to start in the analysis regarding removal under Florida law is Fla. Stat. 736.0706 which provides:
(1) The settlor, a cotrustee, or a beneficiary may request the court to remove a trustee, or a trustee may be removed by the court on the court’s own initiative.
(2) The court may remove a trustee if:
(a) The trustee has committed a serious breach of trust;
(b) The lack of cooperation among cotrustees substantially impairs the administration of the trust;
(c) Due to the unfitness, unwillingness, or persistent failure of the trustee to administer the trust effectively, the court determines that removal of the trustee best serves the interests of the beneficiaries; or
(d) There has been a substantial change of circumstances or removal is requested by all of the qualified beneficiaries, the court finds that removal of the trustee best serves the interests of all of the beneficiaries and is not inconsistent with a material purpose of the trust, and a suitable cotrustee or successor trustee is available.
(3) Pending a final decision on a request to remove a trustee, or in lieu of or in addition to removing a trustee, the court may order such appropriate relief underย s. 736.1001(2)ย as may be necessary to protect the trust property or the interests of the beneficiaries.
Section 736.0706 provides that a trustee may be removed if they have committed a serious breach of trust, there is a lack of cooperation among co-trustees, they are unfit or unwilling to administer the trust, or there has been a substantial change in circumstances.
Several cases have applied and interpreted this statute, providing additional guidance on the grounds for removal of a trustee. In Wallace v. Comprehensive Pers. Care Servs., the court held that the probate court has the power to remove a trustee even if the trust document contains other methods for removal. This case emphasizes that the statutory grounds for removal take precedence over any provisions in the trust document.
In Kountze v. Kountze, the court emphasized that a factual finding must be made as to the trustee’s unfitness, unwillingness, or persistent failure to administer the trust effectively before removal is warranted.
In Parr v. Cushing, the court noted that a trustee may be removed for abuse or wrongdoing in the administration of the trust, mismanagement, or hostility or tension with beneficiaries. However, the court cautioned that hostility or tension alone is not sufficient grounds for removal. Similarly, in Gresham v. Strickland, the court reiterated that removal generally requires a clear showing of abuse or wrongdoing.
Several cases have also affirmed the removal of a trustee for breaching their fiduciary duty. For example, in Demello v. Buckman, the court affirmed the removal of a trustee for a conflict of interest and breach of fiduciary duty. In Brigham v. Brigham, the court discussed the duties of a trustee, including the duty to administer the trust diligently for the benefit of the beneficiaries and to deal impartially with the trust beneficiaries.
The removal of a trustee is a serious matter that requires careful consideration of the specific circumstances and legal procedures involved. The Florida Trust Code provides a framework for trustee removal in Section 736.0706, which outlines the grounds and procedures for removing a trustee in Florida.
Under Section 736.0706(1), a trustee may be removed if the settlor, a co-trustee, or a beneficiary requests the court to remove the trustee, or if the court removes the trustee on its own initiative. This provision recognizes that there may be situations where a trustee is not fulfilling their duties, and someone needs to take action to protect the interests of the trust and its beneficiaries.
Section 736.0706(2) outlines the specific grounds for removal of a trustee. For example, a trustee may be removed if they have committed a serious breach of trust. This could include situations where a trustee has mismanaged trust assets, failed to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries, or engaged in self-dealing.
Another ground for trustee removal is a lack of cooperation among co-trustees that substantially impairs the administration of the trust. For instance, if two co-trustees cannot agree on how to administer the trust, and their lack of cooperation is negatively impacting the trust’s administration, the court may remove one of the co-trustees.
In addition, a trustee may be removed if they are unfit, unwilling, or persistently failing to administer the trust effectively, and the court determines that removal of the trustee best serves the interests of the beneficiaries. For example, in one case I handled, a trustee was unwilling to follow the terms of the trust agreement and was not acting in the best interests of the beneficiaries. The court removed the trustee and appointed a suitable successor trustee to manage the trust effectively.
Finally, a trustee may be removed if there has been a substantial change of circumstances, or if all of the qualified beneficiaries request removal, the court finds that removal best serves the interests of all the beneficiaries and is not inconsistent with a material purpose of the trust, and a suitable co-trustee or successor trustee is available. For instance, if a trust is created for the benefit of a minor child, and the trustee is no longer able to effectively manage the trust due to their age or illness, the court may remove the trustee and appoint a successor trustee.
Section 736.0706(3) provides that the court may order appropriate relief under Section 736.1001(2) to protect the trust property and the interests of the beneficiaries while a final decision on the removal request is pending. This provision ensures that the trust property is protected during the removal process and that the interests of the beneficiaries are safeguarded.
TRANSFER OF ASSETS AFTER REMOVAL & ATTORNEY FEES
After removal the former Trustee must deliver Trust property to a new Trustee to protect the Trust assets. Fla. Stat. 736.0707 provides:
736.0707. Delivery of property by former trustee
(1) Unless a cotrustee remains in office or the court otherwise orders and until the trust property is delivered to a successor trustee or other person entitled to the property, a trustee who has resigned or been removed has the duties of a trustee and the powers necessary to protect the trust property.
(2) A trustee who has resigned or been removed shall within a reasonable time deliver the trust property within the trustee’s possession to the cotrustee, successor trustee, or other person entitled to the property, subject to the right of the trustee to retain a reasonable reserve for the payment of debts, expenses, and taxes. The provisions of this subsection are in addition to and are not in derogation of the rights of a removed or resigning trustee under the common law.
Of critical importance is that Florida law allows for the recovery of attorney fees if you establish a breach of fiduciary obligation which is often the predicate for removal. Fla. Stat. 736.1004 provides the entitlement to fees:
736.1004. Attorney’s fees and costs
(1)(a) In all actions for breach of fiduciary duty or challenging the exercise of, or failure to exercise, a trustee’s powers; and
(b) In proceedings arising underย ss. 736.0410–736.0417,the court shall award taxable costs as in chancery actions, including attorney fees and guardian ad litem fees.
(2) When awarding taxable costs under this section, including attorney fees and guardian ad litem fees, the court, in its discretion, may direct payment from a party’s interest, if any, in the trust or enter a judgment that may be satisfied from other property of the party, or both.
So subsection (1) states that in actions for breach of fiduciary duty or challenging a trustee’s exercise or failure to exercise their powers, and in proceedings arising under Sections 736.0410-736.0417, the court shall award taxable costs, including attorney’s fees and guardian ad litem fees.
This means that if a beneficiary or other interested party brings a legal action against a trustee alleging breach of fiduciary duty or challenging the trustee’s actions, the court may award attorney’s fees and other costs to the prevailing party. This provision helps ensure that beneficiaries and other parties are able to pursue legal action against trustees who have acted improperly or breached their fiduciary duties without having to bear the full burden of legal costs.
Subsection (2) provides guidance on how the court may direct payment of taxable costs. The court has the discretion to direct payment from the party’s interest in the trust, if they have one, or to enter a judgment that may be satisfied from the party’s other assets or property. This provision helps ensure that the party responsible for the improper actions or breach of fiduciary duty is held accountable for the costs associated with the legal action.
Chancery actions are legal actions that are typically brought in equity courts, which are separate from the courts that handle criminal and civil matters. Chancery courts are often used to resolve disputes related to trusts, estates, and other complex legal matters. The reference to chancery actions in Section 736.1004 means that the taxable costs awarded in trust-related legal actions will be similar to those awarded in other equity court proceedings.
For example, if a trustee is accused of mismanaging trust assets, a beneficiary may bring a legal action to challenge the trustee’s actions. If the court finds that the trustee did, in fact, breach their fiduciary duty, the court may award attorney’s fees and other costs to the prevailing party. The court may direct payment of these costs from the trustee’s interest in the trust, or from their other assets or property.
The removal of a trustee is a complex legal process that requires careful consideration of the specific circumstances involved. Florida Courts will not allow the removal for petty differences. On the other hand, if there is danger or damage to the assets there are ample grounds from removal under Florida law and once removed a Trustee must deliver trust assets and can be liable for attorney fees and costs for the removal proceedings. Our attorneys litigate Trust disputes throughout the State of Florida. If you have any questions regarding Trusts give call us for a free consultation. 813-501-5071.
Brice Zoecklein, Esq.
If you found this article useful, you may also be interested in these trust-related articles from our blog:
Florida Trust Administration Basics: Learn the fundamentals of trust administration in Florida.
Florida Trust Administration Basics 2: Dive deeper into the nuances of trust administration in the state.
How to Challenge or Contest a Trust in Florida: Understand the process of contesting a trust in Florida.
Jurisdiction and Venue Basics for Florida Trust Litigation: Learn about jurisdiction and venue considerations for trust litigation in Florida.
What’s the Difference Between a Last Will and Testament and a Trust under Florida Law?: Discover the key differences between wills and trusts in Florida.
Understanding the Differences Between Wills and Trusts Under Florida Law: Gain a deeper understanding of the distinctions between wills and trusts in Florida.
Florida Will and Trust Contests Part I: An Overview: Get an overview of will and trust contests in Florida.
Probate and Estate Planning Considerations for the Different Forms of Real Property Title Available in Florida: Learn about the various forms of property title in Florida and their implications for probate and estate planning.
Be sure to visit our blog for additional resources and information on estate planning and trust-related topics.
Disclaimer:โฏโฏ The information contained in this blog/website is for informational purposes only and provides general information about the law but not specific advice.โฏ This information should not be used as a substitute for advice from competent legal counsel as laws change and the facts in your specific case need to be analyzed.ย
Miranda Pages serves as the Client Operations Manager, bringing over a decade of leadership and management experience in youth program administration. Throughout her career, she has overseen team operations, staff development, and program coordination, experience that translates seamlessly into managing client services and internal operations in a professional environment.
Known as the teamโs go-to resource, Miranda is highly reliable and deeply dedicated to supporting both colleagues and clients. Her commitment to professionalism and service helps ensure the team operates efficiently while maintaining the high level of care clients expect.
Juan G. Croussett is a litigation attorney at Zoecklein Law, where he represents clients in complex probate and trust disputes and other contested matters. Known for his strong courtroom presence and strategic approach to advocacy, Juan focuses on protecting clientsโ interests through thorough preparation, persuasive legal argument, and disciplined case management.
Juan earned his Juris Doctor from Florida Coastal School of Law and holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and History from the University of South Florida. Over the course of his career, he has developed extensive litigation experience handling a variety of complex matters, including property disputes, dependency proceedings, and high-conflict cases involving sensitive family issues.
Before joining Zoecklein Law, Juan served as a Senior Attorney with the Florida Department of Children and Families and later as Lead Dependency Attorney at The Spring of Tampa Bay. In these roles, he regularly appeared in court, managed complex case portfolios, and advocated on behalf of individuals navigating difficult legal circumstances.
At Zoecklein Law, Juan brings this depth of litigation experience to guide clients through challenging disputes with clarity, diligence, and strong advocacy. He is committed to developing thoughtful legal strategies and delivering results-driven representation.
Outside of his legal practice, Juan is a devoted husband and father who values family and community
Keegan Ashmore Gothers is an attorney at Zoecklein Law, where he assists clients with probate, estate, guardianship, and other civil litigation matters. He is known for his strong analytical skills, attention to detail, and ability to navigate complex legal issues while providing thoughtful and strategic support throughout the litigation process.
Keegan earned his Juris Doctor from the University of Miami School of Law and holds a Bachelor of Science in Sports Administration with a minor in Business Administration from the University of Louisville. During law school, he distinguished himself in competitive arbitration competitions, earning recognition as a champion in the University of Miami MLB Arbitration Competition and a finalist in the Tulane International MLB Arbitration Competition.
Prior to joining Zoecklein Law, Keegan gained experience working on a variety of civil litigation matters, including real estate disputes, contract issues, probate matters, and business disputes. He has experience drafting pleadings, conducting legal research, preparing discovery, and assisting with depositions, mediations, and motion hearings.
Outside of his legal practice, Keegan enjoys watching sports, spending time with friends and family, and golfing. His background in athletics reflects a competitive spirit and team-oriented mindset that he brings to his work serving clients
Mr. Rubin currently focuses on probate administration, estate litigation, and general civil litigation.ย Mr. Rubin grew up in Miami, Florida, and graduated from the University of Miami where he obtained a Bachelorโs of Science in Communications.
Mr. Rubin obtained his juris doctorate degree from Florida International University College of Law in Miami, Florida.ย While at Florida International University, Mr. Rubin was a member of the Negotiation and Mediation Team, and competed in several competitions, including the Tulane Law School Professional Football Negotiation Competition.ย While at Florida International University, Mr. Rubin interned at the Miami-Dade State Attorneyโs Office and the Broward Public Defenderโs Office.
After graduating, Mr. Rubin worked at the Fort Myers Public Defenderโs Office as an Assistant Public Defender, and then worked for Florida Rural Legal Services, where he focused on family and immigration law.ย Mr. Rubin joined Zoecklein Law, P.A. in July of 2023.ย While not working, Mr. Rubin enjoys spending time with his girlfriend and their three cats, four spiders, one snake, and one scorpion.
A Florida Bar licensed attorney since 2011 with a passion for justice, a track record of successful courtroom and jury trial experience, and a diverse background that extends beyond the legal world. As a past assistant state attorney and co-owner of a successful online business, I bring a unique blend of legal expertise and entrepreneurial spirit to everything I do.
My dedication to the well-being of the community began with my service in the U.S. Army Reserve, evolved into keeping drunk drivers off the street, and is now focused on helping people find closure during difficult times, putting loved ones to rest, and mitigating the injustices of the legal system.
I grew up in Tampa, Florida, and after 2 years at the American University in Washington, D.C., I returned to the state and graduated with honors from the University of Florida with a degree in history. I received my Juris Doctor from the University of Maine. After deciding New England winters were too gloomy, I returned to the state for a second time. When I am not working, I cherish spending time with my wife and our pets.
Mrs. Zoecklein is a highly accomplished and driven professional with a successful track record in both accounting and customer service. As a devoted spouse and parent to three wonderful children, She values the importance of work-life balance and strives to lead by example in maintaining a fulfilling family life alongside her career.
With an innate sense of self-drive and ambition, Mrs. Zoecklein has consistently demonstrated exceptional leadership and organizational skills, making her an invaluable asset to every team she has been a part of. Drawing from her experience in accounting, she has managed financial operations with precision and an eye for detail, ensuring smooth financial transactions and accurate record-keeping.
In the realm of customer service, Mrs. Zoecklein has honed her communication and interpersonal skills, establishing strong rapport with clients and colleagues alike. She takes great pride in delivering exceptional service, consistently exceeding expectations, and ensuring client satisfaction.
Outside of her professional pursuits, Mrs. Zoecklein finds immense joy in the company of her loving spouse and three children. She believes that family forms the cornerstone of a fulfilling life and embraces opportunities to create lasting memories with them. Whether it’s embarking on adventurous outings, engaging in creative endeavors, or simply relishing quality time at home.
With a perfect blend of professional dedication and family-centered values Mrs. Zoecklein embodies a well-rounded and driven individual, whose commitment to excellence extends to both her career and the cherished relationships that enrich her life.
Mr. Zoecklein’s primary focus centers on Probate and Plaintiff’s Civil Litigation. His esteemed team is actively handling cases across the State of Florida in the areas of probate administration, estate litigation, insurance claims, and business law. Hailing from Blacksburg, Virginia, he graduated cum laude from Virginia Tech with a degree in business management, successfully running multiple franchises in Virginia and North Carolina during his time there. Pursuing higher education, Mr. Zoecklein earned his juris doctorate degree cum laude, along with a Masters in Business Administration, from Stetson University College of Law, where he notably represented the university in numerous national and international legal academic competitions. A highlight of his law school journey was winning a National Moot Court competition for Stetson, displaying his exceptional legal acumen. During his time at Stetson, Brice also contributed to the Center for Advocacy of Elder Law and interned at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida. Following graduation, he embarked on a career with a prominent insurance defense firm, but his passion for Plaintiff advocacy and consumer justice led him to dedicate his legal pursuits exclusively to the representation of consumer rights. Apart from his professional endeavors, Mr. Zoecklein treasures quality time with his wife and three children. Through his unwavering pursuit of justice, both inside and outside the courtroom, Brice Zoecklein exemplifies the essence of a compassionate advocate and a reputable professional, dedicated to upholding the values of integrity, empathy, and fairness in all aspects of his life.
Stetson University College of Law โ cum laude
Virginia Polytechnic Institute โ cum laude
Mr. Zoecklein and Zoecklein Law are currently litigating cases in the following practice areas:
Email: [email protected]
Tampa Office: (813) 993-4967
Lakeland Office: (863) 808-0530
Sarasota: (941) 313-3330
We've been alerted to call you! Look forward to our call as soon as we can.