Se Habla Español
Lines are Available 24/7
Se Habla Español
A special needs trust in Florida is a legal arrangement that allows a beneficiary with disabilities to receive assets without losing means-tested government benefits like Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). The trust holds and manages funds for the beneficiary’s benefit while preserving their public-benefits eligibility.
Florida recognizes two main types of special needs trusts: a first-party SNT (funded with the beneficiary’s own assets, often from a personal-injury settlement, and subject to Medicaid payback at death under 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(A)), and a third-party SNT (funded by parents, grandparents, or others for the disabled person’s benefit, with no Medicaid payback). Both must comply with Fla. Stat. § 736 (the Florida Trust Code) and federal SSA POMS rules.
Trust litigation involving special-needs trusts has its own Medicaid + SSI implications.
How an SNT coordinates with the rest of your estate plan to protect benefits.
A special needs trust (also called a supplemental needs trust) holds money for a person with a disability without making that person the owner of it. That single feature is what keeps Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Florida Medicaid in place, because both programs cut off when a recipient owns more than $2,000 in countable assets (20 C.F.R. § 416.1205(c); Fla. Admin. Code R. 65A-1.716(5)(a)). An inheritance, a personal injury settlement, a gift from a grandparent, or a lump sum of back benefits lands in the beneficiary’s name and ends the benefits the following month. Placed in a properly drafted trust, the same money pays for therapy, a vehicle, a companion on a trip, a computer, or a prepaid funeral, and the benefits continue.
This guide explains how special needs trusts work under federal and Florida law, the three kinds of trust and when each is the right tool, the situations in which Florida families most often need one, what a trustee may and may not pay for, how the trust is administered and taxed, and the mistakes that cost beneficiaries their eligibility. Every statute, regulation, Social Security policy section, and court decision cited here was read from its primary source on September 2, 2026. Zoecklein Law, P.A. drafts first-party, third-party, and pooled-trust arrangements for families throughout Florida; the consultation is free at 877-206-0022.
The 2026 numbers that drive every special needs decision
SSI and Medicaid are means-tested. A resource is “cash or other liquid assets or any real or personal property that an individual (or spouse, if any) owns and could convert to cash to be used for his or her support and maintenance” (20 C.F.R. § 416.1201(a)). Florida’s SSI-related Medicaid programs, including the Institutional Care Program that pays for nursing home care and the home and community-based waivers that pay for care at home, apply the same $2,000 limit (Fla. Admin. Code R. 65A-1.712(1)(g); R. 65A-1.716(5)(a)).
Congress closed the obvious workaround in 1993 and again in 1999. A trust funded with the beneficiary’s own money is counted “without regard to the purposes for which a trust is established, whether the trustees have or exercise any discretion under the trust, any restrictions on when or whether distributions may be made from the trust, or any restrictions on the use of distributions from the trust” (42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(2)(C); the parallel SSI rule is 42 U.S.C. § 1382b(e)(2)(C)). An irrevocable self-settled trust counts to the extent “there are any circumstances under which payment from the trust could be made to or for the benefit of the individual” (§ 1396p(d)(3)(B)). Calling a trust “discretionary” or “supplemental” does nothing by itself.
Two escape routes exist, and they are the whole subject of special needs planning:
Funded by parents, grandparents, siblings, or anyone other than the beneficiary. No age limit, no Medicaid payback, and whatever remains at the beneficiary’s death passes to the family members the settlor names. This is the estate-planning workhorse. It can be a standalone trust signed and funded today, a sub-trust inside a will or revocable living trust that springs into existence at the parent’s death, or both. The firm’s usual recommendation is both: a signed standalone trust gives every relative one receptacle to name in a will, a life insurance policy, or a retirement account today, and the sub-trust catches anything that flows through the parent’s own plan.
Florida law supplies the protection. A spendthrift clause prevents creditors from reaching the beneficiary’s interest before distribution (Fla. Stat. § 736.0502(3)), and, more importantly, “if a trustee may make discretionary distributions to or for the benefit of a beneficiary, a creditor of the beneficiary … may not: (a) Compel a distribution that is subject to the trustee’s discretion; or (b) Attach or otherwise reach the interest, if any, which the beneficiary might have as a result of the trustee’s authority to make discretionary distributions” (Fla. Stat. § 736.0504(2)). Florida’s Fourth District applied that rule to hold that a creditor of a discretionary-trust beneficiary “may not compel a distribution from the trustee or attach any interest in the trust before the trustee makes a distribution,” even where the trustee had abused his discretion. Miller v. Kresser, 34 So. 3d 172, 176 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
One cardinal rule: the beneficiary’s own money must never go into a third-party trust. Even one dollar of the beneficiary’s assets makes that portion of the trust self-settled (42 U.S.C. § 1382b(e)(2)(B); POMS SI 01120.201 C.2.a).
Funded with the beneficiary’s own money, most often a personal injury settlement, an inheritance that arrived outright, a divorce award, or accumulated benefits. Federal law excludes “[a] trust containing the assets of an individual under age 65 who is disabled (as defined in section 1382c(a)(3) of this title) and which is established for the benefit of such individual by the individual, a parent, grandparent, legal guardian of the individual, or a court if the State will receive all amounts remaining in the trust upon the death of such individual up to an amount equal to the total medical assistance paid on behalf of the individual under a State plan” (42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(A)).
Every clause is an element. The beneficiary must be under 65 when the trust is created and each time money is added (POMS SI 01120.203 B.2, B.3). The beneficiary must be disabled under the Social Security definition (42 U.S.C. § 1382c(a)(3)). The trust must be established by one of the listed persons; since the Special Needs Trust Fairness Act took effect on December 13, 2016, a competent adult may sign his or her own trust (Pub. L. 114-255, § 5007). The trust must be for the beneficiary’s sole benefit during life (POMS SI 01120.201 F.1). And the instrument must say, in specific language, that at death “the State(s)” are paid back first, up to total medical assistance paid, without limiting the payback to Florida or to any period of time (POMS SI 01120.203 B.8).
Florida’s Third District enforced that bargain in 2024. A probate court had directed a guardian to establish a first-party trust from a disabled minor’s wrongful-death settlement; when the beneficiary reached adulthood and was no longer disabled, the trustee tried to terminate the trust and hand him everything without paying the Agency for Health Care Administration’s claim. The court reversed: “There is, though, a quid pro quo for this benefit: the Trust’s ‘payback’ provision … until AHCA is repaid for the total medical assistance paid on Ryan’s behalf by Medicaid, the remaining assets in the Trust cannot be distributed to Ryan.” Agency for Health Care Admin. v. Spence, 394 So. 3d 1207, 1210 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).
A pooled trust is a master trust “established and managed by a non-profit association” in which “[a] separate account is maintained for each beneficiary of the trust, but, for purposes of investment and management of funds, the trust pools these accounts” (42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(C)(i), (ii)). The beneficiary, a parent, grandparent, guardian, or court signs a joinder agreement instead of drafting a trust. At death, the nonprofit may keep some or all of the account; whatever it does not retain goes to the State up to the Medicaid paid (§ 1396p(d)(4)(C)(iv)). Pooled trusts suit modest sums, families with no willing trustee, and beneficiaries who are 65 or older, subject to the transfer-penalty issue discussed below.
Florida courts have treated the pooled trust as a routine, lawful vehicle. When a developmentally disabled young man aging out of foster care needed his SSI funds protected, the Fourth District approved placing them in a pooled trust and held the joinder fee was “an expense necessary to shield his assets and protect his eligibility for federal welfare benefits.” R.I. v. Department of Children & Families, 47 So. 3d 357, 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
Families usually arrive with one of four questions. The answers turn on three facts: whose money it is, how old the beneficiary is, and how much money is involved.
A third-party supplemental needs trust, signed now and named in every relative’s plan, with a matching sub-trust and override clause in your own will or revocable trust. No payback, no age limit, no dollar limit. Pair it with an ABLE account the beneficiary controls for day-to-day spending.
If he is under 65: a first-party trust under 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(A), with the Medicaid payback, or a pooled-trust account if the sum is modest or no family member can serve as trustee. Up to $20,000 a year can also go into an ABLE account. If he is 65 or older: a pooled trust, with the transfer-penalty analysis, or a spend-down into exempt assets. Report the money to Social Security and the Department of Children and Families the month it arrives.
For an applicant over 65, a pooled trust is the only trust option, and Florida’s penalty exemption is written for beneficiaries under 65, so we compare the penalty period against a spend-down (a prepaid funeral, home repairs, a vehicle, paying debt) and, if income is over $2,982, a qualified income trust. Often the right answer is a combination.
The guardian petitions under Fla. Stat. § 744.441(19), the court establishes the trust (or authorizes the pooled-trust joinder) and retains oversight, and the trust appears on the annual accounting. If the proceeding is a guardian advocacy under chapter 393 for an adult with a developmental disability, the same petition procedure applies.
| Feature | Third-party trust | First-party (d)(4)(A) trust | Pooled trust | ABLE account |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whose money | Anyone but the beneficiary | The beneficiary’s | The beneficiary’s | Anyone’s, up to $20,000 a year |
| Age limit | None | Under 65 to create and to add | None to join; transfer-penalty risk at 65 or older | Disability onset before 46 |
| Medicaid payback at death | No | Yes, to every State that paid | Yes, for what the nonprofit does not retain | Yes, for Medicaid paid after the account opened |
| Who controls spending | Trustee | Trustee | Nonprofit trustee | The beneficiary |
| Housing payments | In-kind support, up to a $351.33 SSI reduction | Same | Same | Not counted if spent in the month withdrawn |
| Typical use | Family estate planning | Settlements, outright inheritances, back benefits | Modest sums, no trustee, over 65 | Monthly spending, rent, savings the beneficiary manages |
The right trust depends on whose money it is, how old the beneficiary is, and what benefits are at stake. These are the situations we see most often.
The classic case. A parent’s will or revocable trust that leaves a share outright to a child on SSI or Medicaid converts the family’s money into the child’s money and forces a payback trust, or a spend-down, at the worst possible moment. The fix is a third-party supplemental needs trust, drafted as a separate instrument or as an article of the parent’s plan, with every beneficiary designation (life insurance, annuities, retirement accounts, transfer-on-death accounts) pointed at the trustee rather than the child. Coordinate the grandparents’ plans too; a grandmother’s well-meant bequest is the most common way a carefully planned child ends up with a first-party trust anyway.
Retirement accounts deserve their own attention. Under the SECURE Act, a beneficiary who is “disabled (within the meaning of section 72(m)(7))” or chronically ill is an eligible designated beneficiary who may take distributions over life expectancy instead of within ten years (26 U.S.C. § 401(a)(9)(E)(ii)(III), (IV)). A trust preserves that treatment only if it is drafted as an “applicable multi-beneficiary trust,” meaning no other person has any right to the account “until the death of all such eligible designated beneficiaries” or the trust divides immediately at the participant’s death (§ 401(a)(9)(H)(iv), (v)). A supplemental needs trust that gives nobody else an interest during the child’s life satisfies that test; a generic family trust usually does not.
Settlement money belongs to the injured person, so the only options are a first-party trust, a pooled trust, an ABLE account for a small portion, or losing benefits. Three things must happen before the trust is funded. First, Florida’s Medicaid lien must be resolved: the Agency for Health Care Administration’s claim under Fla. Stat. § 409.910 “must be satisfied prior to including the settlement proceeds as estate assets” (§ 409.9101(9)), and the United States Supreme Court has held, in a case that arose from Florida, that the State may recover from the portions of a settlement allocated to past and future medical care, though not from the non-medical damages. Gallardo v. Marstiller, 596 U.S. 420 (2022), building on Arkansas Dep’t of Health & Human Servs. v. Ahlborn, 547 U.S. 268 (2006), and Wos v. E.M.A., 568 U.S. 627 (2013). Florida’s statute presumes the agency’s share is half of the recovery after fees and costs, and the injured person may contest that allocation at the Division of Administrative Hearings by proving “by clear and convincing evidence, that the portion of the total recovery which should be allocated as past and future medical expenses is less than the amount calculated by the agency” (Fla. Stat. § 409.910(17)(b)). In 2025 the First District held that when the beneficiary proves the ratio of medical expenses to total damages with unrebutted evidence, the lien is limited to that proportion of the settlement, and the beneficiary’s own comparative negligence is not a factor. Palacios v. Agency for Health Care Admin., 418 So. 3d 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 2025). That allocation fight is often worth more to the family than any drafting decision, and it must be resolved before the trust is funded. Second, Medicare’s conditional payments and any set-aside analysis are separate. Third, if the injured person is a minor or a ward, the court must approve the settlement once suit is filed (Fla. Stat. § 744.387(3)(a)), and a guardianship of the property is required when the net settlement to a minor exceeds $15,000 (§ 744.387(2)). The trust itself should be established by the court’s order, not merely approved after the fact (POMS SI 01120.203 B.7), which is exactly the sequence the Spence court described.
When a relative dies without planning and the disabled beneficiary receives money outright, the money is the beneficiary’s, and the clock is running: SSI counts resources as of the first day of the following month. If the beneficiary is under 65, a first-party trust preserves eligibility with a payback. If the beneficiary is 65 or older, the choices are a pooled trust (with the transfer analysis below), a spend-down into excluded assets such as a home, one vehicle, household goods, and an irrevocable prepaid funeral contract, or an ABLE account for up to $20,000 a year if the disability began before 46. Report the inheritance to Social Security and to the Department of Children and Families on time; the trust cures the resource problem only from the month it is funded.
Support paid directly to a disabled adult child or a disabled former spouse is income to that person and can defeat SSI. Support can instead be assigned to a first-party trust, and a stream of support payments irrevocably assigned to the trust before age 65 keeps flowing without penalty even after 65 (POMS SI 01120.203 B.3). The reverse problem also arises: a beneficiary who owes support. Florida’s spendthrift and discretionary-trust protections give way to support claimants. A spendthrift provision is unenforceable against “[a] beneficiary’s child, spouse, or former spouse who has a judgment or court order against the beneficiary for support or maintenance” (Fla. Stat. § 736.0503(2)(a)), and the Second District has held that a continuing writ of garnishment for child support may attach to the discretionary disbursements of a first-party special needs trust once the trustee elects to make them: “The special needs trust does not protect the father from his legal obligation to support his child.” Alexander v. Harris, 278 So. 3d 721, 724 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019); see also Berlinger v. Casselberry, 133 So. 3d 961 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (alimony).
Retroactive Social Security or SSI awards, workers’ compensation, and employment settlements all belong to the recipient. Social Security excludes the unspent portion of a retroactive SSI or Social Security payment from resources for nine months after the month of receipt (20 C.F.R. § 416.1233), but anything left after that counts. A first-party trust or a pooled trust account, or an ABLE contribution within the annual limit, is the planning answer. Since December 13, 2016 a competent adult may establish the trust personally (42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(A); POMS SI 01120.203 C.2); a trust signed through an agent under a power of attorney is treated as established by the individual (POMS SI 01120.203 B.6.b), which is fine for trusts dated after the Fairness Act and fatal for older ones. Draper v. Colvin, 779 F.3d 556 (8th Cir. 2015), is the cautionary case: parents who signed under a power of attorney before 2016 created a countable resource, and a later court order approving the trust could not cure it.
A guardian cannot create a trust for a ward without court approval. Florida Statutes section 744.441(19) authorizes a guardian of the property, “[a]fter obtaining approval of the court pursuant to a petition for authorization to act,” to “create irrevocable trusts of property of the ward’s estate which may extend beyond the disability or life of the ward in connection with estate, gift, income, or other tax planning or in connection with estate planning,” and adds that “[t]he court shall retain oversight of the assets transferred to a trust, unless otherwise ordered by the court.” The petition recites the ward’s disability, the benefits at stake, and the assets that exceed the limit, attaches the trust or the pooled-trust joinder, and asks the court to establish the trust and authorize funding. The trust then appears in the annual guardianship accounting. Zoecklein Law has obtained these orders for wards in several Florida circuits; the process usually takes a few weeks and the order should establish the trust rather than approve one already signed (POMS SI 01120.203 B.7).
A first-party trust cannot be created or funded at 65 or older (POMS SI 01120.203 B.2, B.3). A pooled trust has “no age restriction” for resource counting, “[h]owever, a transfer of resources into a trust for an individual age 65 or over may result in a transfer penalty” (POMS SI 01120.203 D.1, Note 1). Florida’s Medicaid policy says the same thing by implication: the Department of Children and Families manual recognizes that “[p]ooled trusts for the disabled can be established for individuals of any age” (ESS Program Policy Manual 1640.0576.08), but its no-penalty rule is written for “a pooled trust for individuals under age 65” (1640.0576.09), and its list of penalty-free transfers covers trusts “for the sole benefit of a disabled individual under age 65” (1640.0609.05; Fla. Admin. Code R. 65A-1.712(3)(c)1). The Eighth Circuit reached the same result under the federal statute in Center for Special Needs Trust Administration, Inc. v. Olson, 676 F.3d 688 (8th Cir. 2012). For an applicant over 65, the account is excluded but the funding may be a penalized transfer within the 60-month look-back, so the analysis is a comparison between the penalty period and the alternatives, including a qualified income trust for income over the $2,982 cap and a spend-down into exempt assets. Advice that Florida never penalizes pooled-trust funding at any age is not supported by the current policy text.
If the settlor is alive, the plan is amended. If the settlor has died or the trust is irrevocable, Florida’s decanting statute is the repair tool. Section 736.04117 defines a “supplemental needs trust” as “a trust that the authorized trustee believes would not be considered a resource for purposes of determining whether the beneficiary who has a disability is eligible for government benefits” (§ 736.04117(1)(j)) and lets a trustee with any power to invade principal for a beneficiary with a disability appoint that principal to a supplemental needs trust, on 60 days’ notice to the qualified beneficiaries, without court approval and notwithstanding a spendthrift clause (§ 736.04117(4), (8), (9)). The statute’s limits are strict. In Harrell v. Badger, 171 So. 3d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015), a trustee decanted a disabled beneficiary’s testamentary trust into a pooled-trust account without notice; because the pooled trust’s joinder made other account holders the remaindermen, “[t]he second trust clearly included beneficiaries not contemplated by the original Trust,” the decanting was invalid, and the trustee was removed. Every will and revocable trust the firm drafts also carries an override clause directing that any share passing to a beneficiary who is, or becomes, disabled is held in a supplemental needs trust instead of distributed outright.
A trust may buy and hold a home for the beneficiary, pay the property taxes, insurance, and utilities, and let the beneficiary live there rent-free. The cost is an SSI reduction under the in-kind support and maintenance rules, capped at the presumed maximum value, $351.33 a month in 2026 (20 C.F.R. § 416.1140(a)(1)). For a family weighing a $1,500 apartment against a $351 benefit reduction, that is often a good trade, and it is a decision to make deliberately with counsel rather than discover on a Social Security notice. Rent paid from an ABLE account, by contrast, is not counted at all (POMS SI 01130.740 C.4), which is why many families pair the two.
Not sure which trust fits your situation?
Tell us whose money it is, the beneficiary’s age, and which benefits are involved, and we will tell you which of the three structures applies and what it will cost. Call 877-206-0022 or request a free consultation. We serve families throughout Florida.
Once the trust is excluded, every distribution is tested under the SSI income rules. “Income is anything you receive in cash or in-kind that you can use to meet your needs for food or shelter” (20 C.F.R. § 416.1102). Payment of a bill directly to a vendor is not income, except for the in-kind value of any shelter it provides (§ 416.1103(g)). The practical rules, from POMS SI 01120.200 E.1:
A first-party trustee has an additional constraint: the sole-benefit rule. Payments to third parties are permitted when the goods or services are “for the primary benefit of the trust beneficiary,” and Social Security does not read that “so strictly as to prevent any collateral benefit to anyone else” (a house others also live in, a television others also watch), but a car the beneficiary’s grandchild drives to work every day violates it (POMS SI 01120.201 F.3.a). Paid family caregivers, companion services, and the travel costs of a companion whose presence is necessary because of the beneficiary’s condition are allowed (F.3.a, F.3.b). Paying a sibling’s tuition or a parent’s mortgage from a first-party trust is not a countable distribution; it disqualifies the trust.
An ABLE account under 26 U.S.C. § 529A is a tax-advantaged account the beneficiary controls. For 2026 the rules changed in two ways families should know. First, the disability must have begun before age 46, up from 26, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025 (§ 529A(e)(1); Pub. L. 117-328, Div. T, § 124). Second, the annual contribution cap is $20,000, and it is no longer tied to the $19,000 gift-tax exclusion (Rev. Proc. 2025-32 § 4.34). For SSI, the first $100,000 in the account is disregarded, distributions are not income, and if the balance exceeds $100,000 SSI is suspended rather than terminated while Medicaid continues (Pub. L. 113-295, Div. B, § 103; POMS SI 01130.740 C.3, C.4, D.1). At death the State is a creditor for Medicaid paid after the account was opened (§ 529A(f)). Florida’s program is the Florida ABLE program under Fla. Stat. § 1009.986; account funds are exempt from creditors’ claims (§ 1009.986(6); § 222.22(5)), and Florida Medicaid “may not file a claim for Medicaid recovery of funds in an ABLE account” except as federal law requires (§ 1009.986(7)(b)). A special needs trust may fund the beneficiary’s ABLE account, and the usual design is trust for large or irregular expenses, ABLE for housing and month-to-month spending.
Choosing the trustee. The beneficiary can never serve as trustee, hold a power to remove the trustee, or direct distributions. A parent or sibling who will pay vendors directly, keep records, and call counsel before any housing or cash decision is often the right choice, with a bank or trust company named as successor. For large first-party trusts and court-established trusts, a professional trustee from the start is common.
Accountings and notices. Under the Florida Trust Code the trustee must notify the qualified beneficiaries within 60 days of accepting the trust and must provide an annual trust accounting, on termination, and on any change of trustee (Fla. Stat. § 736.0813(1)(a), (b), (d); the contents are prescribed by § 736.08135). Because a beneficiary with a disability may be unable to receive and act on those notices, the instrument should name a designated representative under § 736.0306 to receive them; the trustee cannot fill that role (§ 736.0306(2)). Claims against a trustee for matters adequately disclosed in an accounting are barred six months after receipt when the accounting carries the statutory limitation notice (§ 736.1008(2), (4)(a)).
Agency review. The executed trust is reported to Social Security and to the Department of Children and Families. In Florida every special trust “must be forwarded to the Region or Circuit Program Office for review and Circuit Legal Counsel’s written approval before the case can be approved” (ESS Program Policy Manual 1640.0576.08, .11), and the trustee of a first-party, pooled, or qualified income trust “shall provide quarterly statements to the Department which identify all deposits to and disbursements from the trust for each month during the eligibility period” (Fla. Admin. Code R. 65A-1.702(13)(d)).
Income tax. A first-party trust is generally reported as a grantor trust owned by the beneficiary, so the beneficiary reports the income. A third-party trust is a separate taxpayer that files its own return and, if it is a “qualified disability trust” whose beneficiaries are all Social Security-determined disabled at year end, deducts $5,300 for 2026 in place of the ordinary trust exemption (26 U.S.C. § 642(b)(2)(C); Rev. Proc. 2025-32 § 4.35).
The trustee decides every distribution, keeps every record, files the returns, answers the agencies, and, in a first-party trust, protects the sole-benefit rule with every check. Three options are common:
Florida law gives the beneficiary, or the designated representative acting for the beneficiary, real remedies against a trustee who fails: an annual accounting is mandatory (Fla. Stat. § 736.0813(1)(d)), a beneficiary may sue for breach of trust, and a court may remove a trustee. In Harrell v. Badger, 171 So. 3d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015), the Fifth District removed a trustee who followed bad advice, sold the trust’s home, and moved the money without the notice the statute requires. Choose the trustee with that standard in mind.
A trust says what the trustee may do; a letter of intent tells the trustee who the beneficiary is. It is a non-binding memorandum from the parents describing the beneficiary’s diagnosis and history, doctors and therapists, medications, daily routine, likes and dislikes, religious practice, friendships, what calms and what upsets, benefits and case managers, and the parents’ hopes for the beneficiary’s living arrangement and quality of life. Every third-party trust the firm drafts authorizes the trustee to consider it. Update it yearly; it is the most valuable document in the file on the day the parents are gone.
A trust that is signed but never funded protects nothing. These are the steps that follow signing, in order.
Families often confuse the two. Estate recovery is Florida’s claim against a deceased Medicaid recipient’s probate estate for benefits paid after age 55 (Fla. Stat. § 409.9101(2), (3)). It is a creditor claim in probate, it is not enforced while the recipient is survived by a spouse, a child under 21, or a blind or permanently disabled child (§ 409.9101(6)), and it cannot reach protected homestead or other exempt property (§ 409.9101(7), (10)). It does not reach a third-party trust at all. The payback in a first-party or pooled trust is a different, broader obligation created by the trust instrument and federal law: it reaches everything in the trust, it is not limited to age 55 or to long-term care services, and it runs to every State that paid Medicaid for the beneficiary. Before the payback, the trustee may pay only taxes due because of the death and the reasonable costs of winding up the trust; funeral expenses, third-party debts, and distributions to family members must wait (POMS SI 01120.203 E.1, E.2), which is why a first-party trustee should buy an irrevocable prepaid funeral contract during the beneficiary’s lifetime.
The process begins with a free consultation in which we identify whose money is involved, which benefits the beneficiary receives or will need, the beneficiary’s age, whether a guardianship or a pending lawsuit is involved, and what other family members’ plans say. From there we select the instrument: a standalone third-party trust, a sub-trust article and override clause for the client’s own will or revocable trust, a first-party trust, a pooled-trust joinder, or a guardianship petition and order. We draft, review the instrument with the family and the intended trustee, and execute it before two witnesses and a notary. After signing we obtain the taxpayer identification number, open the trust account, retitle assets and redirect beneficiary designations, report the trust to Social Security and the Department of Children and Families, and give the trustee a written distribution guide covering exactly what the trust may pay for and when to call us. We calendar the annual accounting, benefit redeterminations, and, for a first-party trust, the beneficiary’s 65th birthday.
Standard Florida estate plans are quoted at flat fees of $3,500 to $5,000; special needs trusts, court-established trusts, and settlement-funded trusts are quoted individually after the consultation, in a written engagement letter, with no hourly billing for the planning phase. Zoecklein Law serves families throughout Florida from its headquarters in Brandon and its St. Petersburg and Orlando offices. Call 877-206-0022 or request a consultation online.
Zoecklein Law, P.A. drafts and administers special needs trusts for families across Florida: third-party trusts inside a complete estate plan, first-party trusts funded from settlements and inheritances, pooled-trust joinders, and court-established trusts for wards. We also handle the guardianship, Medicaid planning, and trust litigation that surround these trusts, so one firm can carry a family from the petition through funding and, when necessary, into court.
A special needs trust holds assets for a person with a disability so that the person does not own them for purposes of SSI and Medicaid, which cut off at $2,000 in countable assets. A trustee spends the money on things the programs do not cover. Third-party trusts are funded by family and carry no Medicaid payback; first-party trusts under 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(A) and pooled trusts under § 1396p(d)(4)(C) hold the beneficiary’s own money and repay Medicaid at death.
Yes, if the trust was established on or after December 13, 2016. The Special Needs Trust Fairness Act, section 5007 of the 21st Century Cures Act, added “the individual” to the list of permitted creators in 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(A). The individual must be under 65 and must have capacity to sign.
No. The payback applies only to trusts funded with the beneficiary’s own assets. A trust funded entirely by parents, grandparents, or others passes its remainder to whomever the settlor names, and Florida’s Medicaid estate recovery claim reaches only the probate estate, not the trust (Fla. Stat. § 409.9101(2)).
It can, but rent, mortgage payments, property taxes, and utilities are in-kind support and maintenance under 20 C.F.R. § 416.1130(b)(1), which reduces SSI by up to $351.33 a month in 2026. Food is no longer counted as of September 30, 2024. Rent paid from the beneficiary’s ABLE account is not counted at all.
The trustee should never give the beneficiary cash, load the beneficiary’s debit card, or buy gift cards; each is unearned income. A first-party trust also may not pay for anyone other than the beneficiary. Everything else, paid directly to the vendor, is generally permitted: medical and dental care not covered by Medicaid, therapy, education, phone and internet, a computer, furniture, clothing, recreation, travel with a needed companion, a vehicle, and a prepaid funeral.
A first-party (d)(4)(A) trust cannot be created or funded at 65 or older. A pooled trust account can be opened at any age and is excluded as a resource, but Florida’s penalty exemption for funding a pooled trust is written only for individuals under 65, so the transfer may trigger a period of ineligibility for nursing home or waiver Medicaid within the 60-month look-back. The decision requires a comparison of the penalty against the alternatives.
Yes. Fla. Stat. § 744.441(19) allows a guardian of the property, with court approval, to create an irrevocable trust of the ward’s property, and the court retains oversight of the assets transferred. The order should establish the trust rather than approve one already signed, and the trust is reported on the annual guardianship accounting.
They complement each other. For 2026 an ABLE account accepts up to $20,000 a year for a beneficiary whose disability began before age 46, the first $100,000 is disregarded for SSI, and distributions are not income even when spent on housing. The trust handles larger and irregular expenses and can fund the ABLE account; at the beneficiary’s death the ABLE account repays Medicaid paid after the account was opened.
Zoecklein Law quotes special needs trusts as a flat fee after a free consultation, set out in a written engagement letter. A standalone third-party trust added to a full estate plan costs less than a court-established first-party trust that requires a guardianship petition, a hearing, lien resolution, and agency review. Standard Florida estate plans run $3,500 to $5,000.
The trustee may pay taxes due because of the death and the reasonable costs of winding up the trust, then must reimburse every State that paid Medicaid for the beneficiary, up to the total paid. Only after that reimbursement does anything pass to the remainder beneficiaries. Funeral expenses cannot be paid ahead of the State, which is why the trust should buy a prepaid funeral contract during the beneficiary’s lifetime. Florida’s Third District enforced the payback even on an early termination in Agency for Health Care Administration v. Spence, 394 So. 3d 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).
Authorities cited in this guide were verified against their primary sources on September 2, 2026, including the United States Code (Cornell LII), the Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR), the Social Security Program Operations Manual System (SSA), the 2026 Florida Statutes (Online Sunshine), the Florida Administrative Code (flrules.org), the Florida Department of Children and Families ESS Program Policy Manual, and reported decisions read in full. Dollar figures are for 2026 and change each January. This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice; every family’s situation is different, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading it.
Miranda Pages serves as the Client Operations Manager, bringing over a decade of leadership and management experience in youth program administration. Throughout her career, she has overseen team operations, staff development, and program coordination, experience that translates seamlessly into managing client services and internal operations in a professional environment.
Known as the team’s go-to resource, Miranda is highly reliable and deeply dedicated to supporting both colleagues and clients. Her commitment to professionalism and service helps ensure the team operates efficiently while maintaining the high level of care clients expect.
Juan G. Croussett is a litigation attorney at Zoecklein Law, where he represents clients in complex probate and trust disputes and other contested matters. Known for his strong courtroom presence and strategic approach to advocacy, Juan focuses on protecting clients’ interests through thorough preparation, persuasive legal argument, and disciplined case management.
Juan earned his Juris Doctor from Florida Coastal School of Law and holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and History from the University of South Florida. Over the course of his career, he has developed extensive litigation experience handling a variety of complex matters, including property disputes, dependency proceedings, and high-conflict cases involving sensitive family issues.
Before joining Zoecklein Law, Juan served as a Senior Attorney with the Florida Department of Children and Families and later as Lead Dependency Attorney at The Spring of Tampa Bay. In these roles, he regularly appeared in court, managed complex case portfolios, and advocated on behalf of individuals navigating difficult legal circumstances.
At Zoecklein Law, Juan brings this depth of litigation experience to guide clients through challenging disputes with clarity, diligence, and strong advocacy. He is committed to developing thoughtful legal strategies and delivering results-driven representation.
Outside of his legal practice, Juan is a devoted husband and father who values family and community
Keegan Ashmore Gothers is an attorney at Zoecklein Law, where he assists clients with probate, estate, guardianship, and other civil litigation matters. He is known for his strong analytical skills, attention to detail, and ability to navigate complex legal issues while providing thoughtful and strategic support throughout the litigation process.
Keegan earned his Juris Doctor from the University of Miami School of Law and holds a Bachelor of Science in Sports Administration with a minor in Business Administration from the University of Louisville. During law school, he distinguished himself in competitive arbitration competitions, earning recognition as a champion in the University of Miami MLB Arbitration Competition and a finalist in the Tulane International MLB Arbitration Competition.
Prior to joining Zoecklein Law, Keegan gained experience working on a variety of civil litigation matters, including real estate disputes, contract issues, probate matters, and business disputes. He has experience drafting pleadings, conducting legal research, preparing discovery, and assisting with depositions, mediations, and motion hearings.
Outside of his legal practice, Keegan enjoys watching sports, spending time with friends and family, and golfing. His background in athletics reflects a competitive spirit and team-oriented mindset that he brings to his work serving clients
Mr. Rubin currently focuses on probate administration, estate litigation, and general civil litigation. Mr. Rubin grew up in Miami, Florida, and graduated from the University of Miami where he obtained a Bachelor’s of Science in Communications.
Mr. Rubin obtained his juris doctorate degree from Florida International University College of Law in Miami, Florida. While at Florida International University, Mr. Rubin was a member of the Negotiation and Mediation Team, and competed in several competitions, including the Tulane Law School Professional Football Negotiation Competition. While at Florida International University, Mr. Rubin interned at the Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office and the Broward Public Defender’s Office.
After graduating, Mr. Rubin worked at the Fort Myers Public Defender’s Office as an Assistant Public Defender, and then worked for Florida Rural Legal Services, where he focused on family and immigration law. Mr. Rubin joined Zoecklein Law, P.A. in July of 2023. While not working, Mr. Rubin enjoys spending time with his girlfriend and their three cats, four spiders, one snake, and one scorpion.
A Florida Bar licensed attorney since 2011 with a passion for justice, a track record of successful courtroom and jury trial experience, and a diverse background that extends beyond the legal world. As a past assistant state attorney and co-owner of a successful online business, I bring a unique blend of legal expertise and entrepreneurial spirit to everything I do.
My dedication to the well-being of the community began with my service in the U.S. Army Reserve, evolved into keeping drunk drivers off the street, and is now focused on helping people find closure during difficult times, putting loved ones to rest, and mitigating the injustices of the legal system.
I grew up in Tampa, Florida, and after 2 years at the American University in Washington, D.C., I returned to the state and graduated with honors from the University of Florida with a degree in history. I received my Juris Doctor from the University of Maine. After deciding New England winters were too gloomy, I returned to the state for a second time. When I am not working, I cherish spending time with my wife and our pets.
Mrs. Zoecklein is a highly accomplished and driven professional with a successful track record in both accounting and customer service. As a devoted spouse and parent to three wonderful children, She values the importance of work-life balance and strives to lead by example in maintaining a fulfilling family life alongside her career.
With an innate sense of self-drive and ambition, Mrs. Zoecklein has consistently demonstrated exceptional leadership and organizational skills, making her an invaluable asset to every team she has been a part of. Drawing from her experience in accounting, she has managed financial operations with precision and an eye for detail, ensuring smooth financial transactions and accurate record-keeping.
In the realm of customer service, Mrs. Zoecklein has honed her communication and interpersonal skills, establishing strong rapport with clients and colleagues alike. She takes great pride in delivering exceptional service, consistently exceeding expectations, and ensuring client satisfaction.
Outside of her professional pursuits, Mrs. Zoecklein finds immense joy in the company of her loving spouse and three children. She believes that family forms the cornerstone of a fulfilling life and embraces opportunities to create lasting memories with them. Whether it’s embarking on adventurous outings, engaging in creative endeavors, or simply relishing quality time at home.
With a perfect blend of professional dedication and family-centered values Mrs. Zoecklein embodies a well-rounded and driven individual, whose commitment to excellence extends to both her career and the cherished relationships that enrich her life.
Mr. Zoecklein’s primary focus centers on Probate and Plaintiff’s Civil Litigation. His esteemed team is actively handling cases across the State of Florida in the areas of probate administration, estate litigation, insurance claims, and business law. Hailing from Blacksburg, Virginia, he graduated cum laude from Virginia Tech with a degree in business management, successfully running multiple franchises in Virginia and North Carolina during his time there. Pursuing higher education, Mr. Zoecklein earned his juris doctorate degree cum laude, along with a Masters in Business Administration, from Stetson University College of Law, where he notably represented the university in numerous national and international legal academic competitions. A highlight of his law school journey was winning a National Moot Court competition for Stetson, displaying his exceptional legal acumen. During his time at Stetson, Brice also contributed to the Center for Advocacy of Elder Law and interned at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida. Following graduation, he embarked on a career with a prominent insurance defense firm, but his passion for Plaintiff advocacy and consumer justice led him to dedicate his legal pursuits exclusively to the representation of consumer rights. Apart from his professional endeavors, Mr. Zoecklein treasures quality time with his wife and three children. Through his unwavering pursuit of justice, both inside and outside the courtroom, Brice Zoecklein exemplifies the essence of a compassionate advocate and a reputable professional, dedicated to upholding the values of integrity, empathy, and fairness in all aspects of his life.
Stetson University College of Law – cum laude
Virginia Polytechnic Institute – cum laude
Zoecklein Law focuses on the following Florida practice areas:
Email: [email protected]
Toll-Free: (877) 206-0022
Brandon Office: 150 E. Bloomingdale Ave., Brandon, FL 33511
St. Petersburg Office: 4021 Central Ave., Suite B, St. Petersburg, FL 33713
Fax: (813) 925-4310